Keats

“To Autumn”

Grammar Stage Discussion:   What does the poem say?  Harvest images: apples, gourds, hazelnuts,  Season change:  song like other seasons sung by gnats, crickets, lambs, robin.  Sensory images:  small, hear, sight, touch, smell.  Form:  11 lines with ABAB CDED FFG, iambic pentameter, define subject the speculation and musing on the subject.

Dialectic:  What does this mean?  Celebration of autumn, Season of abundance and blessings, picturesque.  Defense of autumn – as worthy as other seasons.  Going blindly into death – death imagery, stubble plains, mourn, sinking, bleating, soft dying day, lives or dies, wailful choir, lives or dies.

Rhetoric:  What is your opinion?  Celebrate where you are – don’t worry about death.  Beauty – thinks about life.   Maturity – this isn’t a bad season, a natural season, be where you are,  appreciate where you are, this isn’t forever, fleeting autumn glory, fleeting but beautiful.  Celebrate accomplishment even though it’s not over.

“Ode on a Grecian Urn”

Grammar Stage Discussion:   What does the poem say?  Unheard music is sweeter.  Greek music of the spheres, music played and depicted.  Back and forth – frozen in time, yet timeless, stopped between.  Fascination with unknown…what was going on, what were the sounds, what….?  Beauty is truth, truth is beauty.  Silence of scene is begging questions.  Vase shall outlive us.

Dialectic:  What does this mean?  Keats experience with urn.  Reading into the object of the story it tells as if real people (not gods).   Can Keats answer these questions?  He tries and does, but can’t fully.  Pinnacle of beauty frozen (captured) never to die.  Keats believes that truth is beauty and beauty is truth because he calls the urn “friend to man”.  Many questions are asked of the vase, but the vase only responds once to a question not even asked.

Rhetoric:  What is your opinion?   What is this vase that speaks and answers questions that it is not asked?  Not Jesus – too pointless for him,  a tangent for truth.  Beauty is a component of truth.  (Creation cost him nothing.)  Not pointing to God.  Beauty and truth are not equal.

Define terms:

Good = beneficial in some way, positive, enriches, classical definition is the end to which everything points

Truth = Jesus, accurate, real, it matches with how things really are, uses 5 senses, classical definition is that which corresponds to reality

Beauty = pleasing, classic definition is that which delights the senses, that which pleases when experienced.

Beatific vision occurs when we get to heaven and see God, we will see the whole of God – Good, Truth and Beauty.  Do these three characteristics relate to the trinity?  Jesus said, “I am the way, the truth, the life.”  Perhaps the Father is Goodness and the Spirit is Beauty.  Beauty is more mysterious, subjective, intangible.

Challenge:  The chief end of man is to glorify God and we do that through constant worship.  Try worshiping God through the avenue of beauty – something pleasing to the senses, to the soul, something timeless, more focused on the Spirit, spontaneous, less controlled.  We can’t control the wind, but we can put ourselves in a position where we can feel it when it blows.

Descartes – Meditations on First Philosophy

January 10, 2010 – Jeff Bruns
Descartes – Meditations on First Philosophy

Reactions:
Appreciate the more, relaxed style to draw in the reader
Notice the “6 day” approach that was modeled after the 6 days of creation and possibly other philosophers
Juxtaposition of the philosophical vs. the theological
Current philosophy reasons God out of logic, math, science while Descartes’ goal was to prove the existence of God

Was Descartes really trying to prove the existence of God?
Introduction states that Descartes’ goal was to convince, but also to invite you into the the thinking process and understanding of the world.  He was acknowledging God, yet adding a more rational thought to sciences, removing the fantastic and mythological.  Rationalism expels mystery and mythical from science.

Why was Descartes proving that we existed?
He was removing everything else to get to the foundation and remove anything else that  cannot be proven.  The foundation is that he exists and the meditations build on each other.

Meditation 1 – Remove anything we can doubt:  senses, sanity, physics, medicine.  We can’t trust our senses because we cannot tell dreams from reality.  He transitions to God  when he says God would not deceive us by his very nature.

Meditation 2 – The fact that I doubt, proves that I exist.   So, what am I?  I am a thing that thinks.
The wax example shows we know what wax is because of our intellect, not because of our senses because the data that our senses experience can change.  But, it is still wax.  A person is not defined by our physical body (arms, legs, head), but by what we think.  A person is defined by what we think.

The mind is more easily known than the body.

Mediation 3 – Types of thoughts:  Innate, adventitious, or invented by me.  Innate ideas are and have always been within us, fictitious or invented ideas come from our imagination, and Adventitious ideas come from experiences of the world. He argues that the idea of God is Innate and placed in us by God and he rejected the possibility that the idea of God is Invented or Adventitious.

The formal reality of anything it its own intrinsic reality, while the objective reality if an idea of an idea is a function of  its representational content. (from book notes)

Meditation 4 – Is humanism creeping in with Descartes?  The will is the part the makes the mistakes.  Although the mind can understand the truth.

Conclusion:
What role does philosophy play in our everyday lives?  It can lead us to be open minded and consider that there could be new information that you have not considered.

How does reading Descartes and learning this process of doubting help us when we evaluate anything?  A class in logic would further refine this skill.

When considering imagination, there is a parallel to the end of the Chronicles of Narnia when the believers and dwarfs were in the shed.  The believers could leave to enter heaven, but the dwarfs could not see heaven or the door.

Poetry of Donne, Shakespeare

poetry is about metaphor this is like that
is crafting and shaping of thoughts
the distilled essence of thought

3 things-

Billy Collins litany

the interconnectedness of all things thinking during the renaissance

metaphysical is not a philosophy

Meta (from Greek: μετά = “after”, “beyond”, “with”, “adjacent”, “self”), is a prefix used in English to indicate a concept which is an abstraction from another concept, used to complete or add to the latter.

idea renaissance- poetry carries truth
give the truest purest idea of life,

word are not worth as much because computers, blogs…

more attentive to words

words were mysterious

poets were set apart
poets were descendants of priest

were was the split?
church abused power wouldn’t let the people read

the church was discredited by discoveries
would not “recant” wrong beliefs
and led to split then complete rejection

distinctions of poetry:
good poetry is rich with many layers such as surface level meaning

reading poetry is like drinking wine best in a group

Batter My Heart:

battering is like a violent attack
political imagery

rhyme scheme = ABBA
meter = iambic pentameter
the form of a poem is integral to its meaning

poetry is meant to be performed
sonnet= 16 lines three quatrains one duo or two quatrains one sextuplet

complaints about love

John Donne shocks readers right from the start

A Valediction Forbidding Mourning

virtuous men depart from the spirit
his friend are not sure when he is dead

meanders more than a sonnet
higher love than most

metaphor of drawing compass

some poets are more accessible

Sonnet 116

topic-love
prompt- a star

high view of love
love doesn’t change with changing circumstances

Sonnet 130

Sir Gawain and the Green Night

What can we learn about the poet?

  • knew a lot about the castle
  • knew about animals
  • knew about courtly manners
  • there are other king arthur stories
  • imaginative and thoughtful person, observant

Why did he start with Troy and Aeneas?

  • Establish credibility as an author
  • Shows historical context, setting
  • Connects modern audience to the glory, chivalry of the ancient heroes

The story takes place over a year and a day. What is the significance of this?

  • Christmas was the highest festival of the year
  • Builds the suspense for the narrative
  • Increases the challenge for Gawain and give him more to achieve

Evaluate Arthur’s reaction to the Green Knight’s arrival and challenge

  • Did Arthur know he would come, did he arrange for a challenge to his knights? or Gawain specifically?

What are the 5 parts of the pentangle represent?

“The ideals of Christian morality and knightly chivalry are brought together in Gawain’s symbolic shield. The pentangle represents the five virtues of knights: friendship, generosity, chastity, courtesy, and piety.” Spark Notes

Trace the temptations. What were they?

  1. adultery/pleasure (lust of the flesh)
  2. riches (lust of the eyes)
  3. invincibility (the belt): testing his faith in God to save him from the Green Knight (boastful pride of life?)

Do these correlate to the three punishment swings of the axe by the Green Knight? First blow was withdrawn because he kept his promise and came after a year. The second blow intentionally missed because he didn’t fall for the wife’s advances. The third strike was for taking the belt without giving it up.

Application: so in what ways are we tested? Any supreme tests? This seems to be a trap.

Was this written to make spiritual points? To strengthen listener’s faith? What else could this be for? It’s a good story, but doesn’t have much to offer without the moral lessons.

Did Morgan la Fay scheme work in the end? Not really.

Beowulf Discussion Questions

1. What two world views are being intermingled in this work? It what passages have world views been specifically communicated?

2. How do Beowulf’s four confrontations with monsters build on each other?

– the story Beowulf relates of nine monsters slayed after a swimming race

– confronting Grendel

– confronting Grendel’s Mother

– avenging his kingdom over the Firedrake

3. What was Beowulf’s weapon of choice? And, what is his battle plan in each instance?

4. Please take a moment to recount the main elements of the story. Does the Beowulf remind you of any other story? For example, many stories relate back to Homer. Does Beowulf related back to any other stories in your way of thinking, or is it a radical departure from the rest? Either way, how so?

5. Has the close examination of this poem challenged your thinking on how to approach difficult situations? In what way(s)?

Bede

Bede (673–735) write it 731 AD in Latin (5 books)
Scholarly monk in north-east of England
He had a vast library for the day, over 200 books
Covers period of Julius Caesar in 60 BC to 731 AD
Best known of Medeival historians in Britain.
Church of St. Paul’s at Jarrow was where he lived and worked all but 7 years of his life.
There is now a museum and re-built monastary at the location http://www.bedesworld.co.uk/

Questions to prepare you for our discussion:
Your Chocolate in My Peanut Butter: Is this a History of Christian Church or Christian History of the Church?

Chapter and Verse: Bede documents entire correspondences from the Pope. Comment on this use of quoting original source material in a history monograph.

Sex in the City: Just for fun, or only for procreation? Pope is clear on this. What would people then do? What would you do? Agree or disagree. Support your answer.

Pelagian Controversy:
Pelagianism is a theological theory named after Pelagius (AD 354 – AD 420/440). It is the belief that original sin did not taint human nature and that mortal will is still capable of choosing good or evil without special Divine aid. Thus, Adam’s sin was “to set a bad example” for his progeny, but his actions did not have the other consequences imputed to Original Sin. Pelagianism views the role of Jesus as “setting a good example” for the rest of humanity (thus counteracting Adam’s bad example) as well as providing an atonement for our sins. In short, humanity has full control, and thus full responsibility, for obeying the Gospel in addition to full responsibility for every sin (the latter insisted upon by both proponents and opponents of Pelagianism). According to Pelagian doctrine, because men are sinners by choice, they are therefore criminals who need the atonement of Jesus Christ. Sinners are not victims, they are criminals who need pardon.

Bede Discussion Notes
9/25/09

Background: watch video clip of “Dark Ages” by History Channel. Introduces life of Bede in the context of the dark ages

church was the economic hub – wealthiest, most educated,

no strong system yet to replace the Roman Empire – no one to maintain the infrastructure set up by Rome (sewers, roads, aqueducts)

Bede was perhaps the most highly educated man in Europe in his time; amassed a library of 250 books
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bede

Is EH a history of the Christian Church or a Christian history of the Church?
Bk II, Ch. 2 – story about date for celebrating Easter
other writings from the Middle Ages are more critical of the church

Bk 1, Ch. 14 – evil befell miscreants

linking physical tragedy to spiritual dimension is common in Christian writings (and in the church at large) – still occurs today…tsunami in Indonesia, Katrina

OT journey of God’s people shows the world’s need for Christ; NT doesn’t make the same link between man’s “goodness” or obedience and God’s blessing

Maybe there was no other plausible explanation for such darkness and suffering in that time? – Political events must be the direct results of God’s judgment or blessing.

Monasteries were like prisons in that monks could not leave freely, no exercise of free will (couldn’t talk except in extreme necessity because that would be an exercise of the will), but the life of the monk offered protection, purpose, work…

Documenting entire correspondences from the Pope
junior leader trying to learn from a senior leader what church teachings are essential

Pope Gregory was considered the last “best pope”—his heart was with the Angles, couldn’t go himself as a missionary but he made sure to send someone

Sex for fun? Or for procreation only?
Manichean/Gnostic view – flesh is bad, spirit is good
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/06592a.htm

Tolkien tried to recreate the missing mythological approach based on the language (how did words like dwarf, elf originate? What were they?)
Who were the Picts?
North British people
later became part of the Scots
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Picts

Bede’s church has been recreated in Jarrow – museum, visitor center, library
http://www.bedesworld.co.uk/

Other comments
descriptions of bishops were interesting and gave insight into their character (Mellitus)
King Edwin – not just facts about him but insight into his character

Bede gives us an interpretive history—his perspective is apparent

Rosy view of the church…but did he have any other choice? Could he have criticized the church as a bishop?

Were there non-Christian writings/stories/histories that didn’t survive (perhaps because they were censored by the Church)? Just as there was likely non-Christian music that didn’t survive because the Church would have censored it.

Summary: Who was Bede?
isolated author with a very narrow perspective on the world

sort of like a homeschooler? stays at home and studies, loves books, reads and writes and majors in letters, quirky, eccentric, not well-rounded, angular, curious

good historian because he’s committed to supporting his claims with evidence

a bright light in a dark spot—he contributes something we could never have gotten in any way

easy for us to be critical of Bede (the cultural rush to attribute divine motives/actions to physical circumstances) but we don’t know what it was like to live in that day

City of God

The Goal for the Night

Trace the argument…..take the Twitter Challenge to create a summary of the argument for each book in 140 characters. 4 Tweets!

Background

313 A.D.  was a turning point.  Constantine made Christianity the official religion of the empire.  A remarkable change.  Christianity now has law on its side.  Freedom of religion.  Freedom of speech.  No longer hiding in the catacombs.

It is  now 100 years later.  A lot has changed.

Approx. 400 AD.  St. Augustine, living in N. Africa, living in a time of chaos in the Roman world.  War was nothing new, but now the “eternal city” is beginning to crack.  The barbarians are making headway.  Why?  Godlessness?

Who is Augustine?  Very first autobiographer.  Confessions.  His personal internal and external story of his spiritual life and journeys.

Book Summaries

Book I

Goths attack – the Roman gods did not protect the Roman people during the barbarian invasions, but God protected both the Christians and the enemies of God as well. – showing real power

Good and bad happen to all people  Matt 5:45 rain falls on the just and unjust

God allows bad things to happen to Christians for their growth vs the heathens for rebuke.(stirring a cesspool vs. stirring perfume)

God allows blessing on good and ungodly as well.

Why are the good and wicked are equally afflicted — who is really good?  None.  There are no good people.  The Problem of Evil.

Ken: Augustine brings out the first of many “big questions”. The philosophical questions of our faith are answered in the Bible, but not specifically asked in the Bible.  Here is where the greatness of City of God is revealed.  The greatness of Augustine’s work is that he identifies the timeless issues of the Christian faith – issues that man has grappled with through the centuries.

God is in charge of all.

Book IV

  • The illogical worship of ineffective Roman gods
  • makes fun of how individual powers are assigned to individual gods
  • birth order of these gods seems preposterous
  • they changed over time  – not so powerful after all
  • Why didn’t they protect us in previous battles?
  • What is so impressive about these gods?

Empires succeed when they follow moral principles. (Nick)

“Kingdoms without justice are like criminal gangs.”  Augustine, Book IV

If you live according to God’s will, will you necessarily prosper?

Book V

What is in control?  Stars?  Fate?  The God of All?

The Providence of God is in control.

Book VI

The scientific argument.  Varro’s opinion, Seneca.

Civil, mythical, and natural theology by Varro is called insanity by Augustine.

The gods do not matter that much.

Augustine is disproving that you must worship the gods to get eternal life.

The Twitter Challenge

Book 1 Tweet (Tait))

Book 4 Tweet (Nick)

Book 5 Tweet (Angie)

Stars? Fate? God? Praise God from whom all blessings flow. The one true god is the source of all power and providence governing the universe.

Book 6 Tweet (Jeff and Pat)

Summary Tweet (Ken)

Augustine’s City of God: though we aren’t debating power of Roman gods or justifying Goth’s attack, the rest is timeless, God explains a lot

Roman Lives

Cato the Elder

  • not too impressive as a character (Pat)
  • impressive as a father (Pat) “Cato’s devotion to his family led him to teach his son himself, thus educating his family as well as the state.” [introduction, page 5]
  • was a great orator “developed and equipped himself with an eloquent style of speech as if it were a second body—a tool that is virtually indispensable of a man is to avoid a life of obscurity and failure.” [1]
  • compare with Cato the Younger, who had some of the same character traits.
  • he was “censor”

Caesar

  • greedy, used money to buy power and influence
  • military strategist, confident, winsome
  • the kind of leader you want to follow
  • better to suffer death once than always life in fear of it
  • how closely did he follow divination (he laughed off the word to “beware the ides of March”)
  • compare/contrast with George Washington

Impact of Caesar, God at work

  • he stabalizes Rome: ends the Republic and institutes Imperial Rome, people have less power, Rome becomes great.
  • all the ingredients for getting the gospel out are in place–the gospel moves West
  • safety for the travelers throughout the western world
  • why did Rome fall? people were comfortable/complacent, hard to control so much land. For an interesting take on this, see Early Middle Ages by Philip Daileader.

Preparation (sent before the discussion)

“I came, I saw, I ate” … recently heard @ previous book club about
Wendy’s chocolate chip brownies.

Don’t miss the fun this Friday as we examine the lives of two notable
Roman dudes.

Please prepare for the evening by:

1.  Writing out 5-6 trivia questions and the answers on 3″x5″ note
cards (or small pieces of paper similar to a 3″x5″ note card).
Questions can be from either story.  They can be about people,
places, quotes, or events.  Please write the question on one side and
the answer on the other.  Please use one card per question, so you should end up with 5-6 note cards – question on one side, answer on the other.
2.  Bring a prize or two for our trivia game.  Prizes should not be
purchased, but should be old, less than stellar stuff that you would
like to donate to someone else’s household.  (We will be playing the
game “Greed”)
3.  Meditate on the following scriptures:
Daniel 2 – story of when Daniel interprets Nebuchadnezzar’s dream – key verse – Daniel 2:21
He changes times and seasons;
he sets up kings and deposes them.
He gives wisdom to the wise
and knowledge to the discerning.

John 19:1-16 – when Jesus was before Pilate – key verse John 19:11
Jesus answered, “You would have no power over me if it were not given to you from above. Therefore the one who handed me over to you is guilty of a greater sin.”

Romans 13:1-7 – key verse Romans 13:1
Everyone must submit himself to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that which God has established. The authorities that exist have been established by God.
See you soon.

Greek Lives, Plutarch: Solon & Lycurgus

Obituary for Solon c. 630 BC–560 BC

Moderate Reformer

Archon
Constitutional reforms
Poet

Solon died suddenly yesterday during a symposium with his closest friends in Northeast Athens. His life was a flash in the pan, he instituted a series of reforms, but in the end will leave no lasting legacy.

Elected to bring unity between the rich and poor in 594 BC. A moderate. He removed the marker stones that enslaved the land. Brought back Athenians to the land, granting citizenship to foreign craftsmen who wanted to live in Athens. if you couldn’t sell your land, it was your person that sold if you had economic crisis. He shook off these burdens. Farmers had been reduced to share croppers (1/6 share men).

Changed the criteria for access to public office. Instead of family, it was wealth that determined your status.

Laws were written down for all to read so they could refer to them.

Limited produce exports to olive oil.

Adopted Euboean system of weights and measures, which was more widely used in the world than the Athenian system.

Formalized the distinction between public and private law.

Most will remember his flurry of initiatives in the late 6th Century: emphasis on the rule of law, freeing workers from their land debts, and . An impressive list to be sure. But this was quickly followed by 10 years of travel around the Mediterranean while the rest of Athens was left to sort out the details, proving that old societies can not be taught new tricks.

In this age of tyrants, the lust for power will no-doubt snuff out whatever remains of such proto-democratic ideals. He is survived by his wife Lambda and his herd of 12,000 goats.

What did you admire about Solon?

On the side of the poor
Passed a law not to talk about Salamis any more
Free the land from debt
Repealed Draco’s laws (death penalty for minor offenses)

Why did Solon do things differently than Lycurgus? Solon seems wise. Is he ahead of his time in insisting on the rule of law?

He gave the Athenians all the laws they could take.

Had the people participate in government, and the rich continue to be officers.

How did they write laws down: on boards? with a machine to turn them?

Lycurgus:

Came to power differently from Solon: through family connection

divided the people into groups, eliminating the aristocracy

He seemed to want what was best for the people. Eliminating classes produces socialism, where you also take away some of the initiative (ambition).

Interesting parallels to today:
contrast Spartan raising of kids (tough, community oriented) to ours today (pampered, individualistic)
education: the public school system out of industrialism, compare/contrast with Spartan system.

Aeneas, books 7-12

Contrast with Iliad:

  • characters in Iliad have more development in the story, a narrative character sketch, here we know them more by their actions than their descriptions.

Where did Aeneas go to get help?

  • Pallanteum, nearby, later Rome, Evander helps, a former Arcadian (Greek)

Contrast Turnus and Aeneas as Heroes

  • Turnus was a Roman, wanted to marry Laviniam (no fault in that),
  • Aeneas is more noble a hero because he’s unselfish, puts the needs of the kingdom over his personal needs.

Role of the gods

  • Jupiter steps out of the picture in X.464, he defers to the Fates
  • How powerful is he? Not as powerful as the Fates, which are never overturned

Truth in Aeneid

  • widely held and endured, so some portions must be true
  • did the Trojans really found Rome? not sure